Connected intake
Bring agreed website forms and inquiry sources into one defined workflow.
{ Service / 01 }
Turn scattered inquiries into a consistent intake process, with useful data, explicit routing rules, and someone responsible for the next step.
Discuss this workflow{ The starting point }
Leads can arrive through different forms and channels, each with different fields. Manual forwarding makes it difficult to see what is missing, who owns the inquiry, and whether it reached the CRM.
{ Illustrative workflow / 01 }
Rules, review points, and exception paths are defined around your process.
{ What we can build }
Bring agreed website forms and inquiry sources into one defined workflow.
Check required fields, normalize values, and identify possible duplicates before creating records.
Assign leads using agreed criteria such as service, territory, or team ownership.
Send incomplete or unmatched inquiries to a review queue with a clear owner.
{ Delivery & checks }
An intake map, field mappings, routing rules, connected CRM handoff, exception paths, and a documented test checklist.
Check missing fields, duplicate submissions, unmatched routes, and unavailable destinations. Agree on how unassigned leads become visible to the team.
Scope, timing, tool selection, and pricing follow a review of your current setup and dependencies.
{ Reference architecture }
The lead-routing blueprint walks through capture, validation, ownership, review, and failure paths. It is an illustrative architecture.
Explore the blueprint{ Before we start }
The first step is reviewing how your forms expose submissions and which integrations or API access are available.
No. Explicit rules are often enough. AI assistance can be considered where unstructured inquiry text needs interpretation, with a review path for uncertain results.
{ Related services }